Transcript for Ovc opengov 20june2009 from 0:21:56 to 0:24:09
Jump to stream view: 0:21:56 to 0:24:09
Jake Brewer: Good question. Real quickly I'll add the other example is the John McCain one. <Audience member: Mayhill Fowler>. Mayhill Fowler. But really, I like this point too. If those are all negative things, there's something also interesting that happens when you have video there and people know about it, which is that—anybody see what happened with the British government two weeks ago, parliament up in arms because basically the stuff they spent their money on was revealed by a FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] request, or that it was leaked early, and so you got two examples of what they basically wanted to have—I promise this is to your point, sometimes I go way over here, but I promise I'll come back—is that that they're spending money on moats on their château. This is your tax dollars on my moat. [U.K. audience member: My tax dollars.] Yeah, your tax dollars, exactly, we're international today.
You kind of gotta believe—and as a result of that, by the way, Nancy Pelosi is now dictating that expenditure data is going to be online—we believe that data doesn't exist unless it's online—but we kinda gotta believe that if members of parliament had known that all of their stuff was going to be available and public and online, they probably wouldn't have spent money on a moat in the first place. Right? There's kind of two-fold things, there's both holding accountable ("by the way, Joe Biden, you said something wrong" or "by the way, George Allan..."), you probably would not have said "you said these things and we're going to hold you accountable for being really stupid," or for saying something bad, but also by doing this, we're creating an infrastructure where people are then kinda just better people. Maybe. Maybe not. But by making it known that this is where it's going to be, or maybe we should just push them into the trench. So these are the issues.