Ovc Opengov on Jun 19th, 2009 :: 0:21:56 to 0:24:09
Total video length: 50 minutes Stream Tools: Meeting Overview | Jump to a different time in this meeting

About | FAQ | Visual finding aid | How to use this page | Transcribe using Universal Subtitles

Download OptionsEmbed Video

Views:258 Duration: 0:02:13 Discussion

George Chriss

0:21:04 to 0:21:56( Edit History Discussion )

George Chriss: Well, I had a question, then also a partial answer to your question.  So going back to essentially the "cartoonification" of a politician when they see a video camera, and they're like "oh!  let me go grab my giant stamp and then let me really simplify the message beyond what it needs to be discussed at."  Something in my experience, I film as many meetings related to shared governance at The Pennsylvania State University that I can, so student governance, the university Board of Trustees, the student newspaper, the whole gamut, and actually what I've seen, gavel to gavel, is that people start becoming more professional, and they start choosing their words more carefully and [they] articulate their positions in really thoughtful ways and it's really been the opposite effect.  I'm wondering if there's any sort of way to knock off [over-]simplification.

0:21:56 to 0:24:09( Edit History Discussion )

Jake Brewer: Good question.  Real quickly I'll add the other example is the John McCain one.  <Audience member: Mayhill Fowler>.  Mayhill Fowler.  But really, I like this point too.  If those are all negative things, there's something also interesting that happens when you have video there and people know about it, which is that—anybody see what happened with the British government two weeks ago, parliament up in arms because basically the stuff they spent their money on was revealed by a FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] request, or that it was leaked early, and so you got two examples of what they basically wanted to have—I promise this is to your point, sometimes I go way over here, but I promise I'll come back—is that that they're spending money on moats on their château.  This is your tax dollars on my moat.   [U.K. audience member: My tax dollars.]  Yeah, your tax dollars, exactly, we're international today.

You kind of gotta believe—and as a result of that, by the way, Nancy Pelosi is now dictating that expenditure data is going to be online—we believe that data doesn't exist unless it's online—but we kinda gotta believe that if members of parliament had known that all of their stuff was going to be available and public and online, they probably wouldn't have spent money on a moat in the first place.  Right?  There's kind of two-fold things, there's both holding accountable ("by the way, Joe Biden, you said something wrong" or "by the way, George Allan..."), you probably would not have said "you said these things and we're going to hold you accountable for being really stupid," or for saying something bad, but also by doing this, we're creating an infrastructure where people are then kinda just better people.  Maybe.  Maybe not.  But by making it known that this is where it's going to be, or maybe we should just push them into the trench.  So these are the issues.

0:24:09 to 0:24:53( Edit History Discussion )

Jake Brewer: The first kind of way that we'll talk about it, if you'd rather not talk about something in this format, then just say "I'd rather not talk about it."  But there's some real technical issues, there's four big ones.  It's "technical," then you have one I call "creative"—that you can shoot all the video in the world, and unless it's compelling in any kind of way then it's kinda not real useful, or getting it to a point where somebody can actually watch it or getting it out there to real people is important.  There's "legal"  and there's "distribution."  I'm going to leave off the last two for the sake of the time we have.  But thinking about "what do we need in order to do this?"  "How is it that we can create these infrastructural components?"  Then "how do we get real people to participate and do this stuff?"  Any questions?

(Copied from the corresponding Internet Archive page.)

Discourse related to the promotion of free expression and innovation in online video.

Crowdsourcing an Open Government: Using Distributed Video to Hold the Elected Accountable

Jake Brewer — Engagement Director, Sunlight Foundation
Robert Millis — Capitol Hub
Abram Stern — Univ. of California, Santa Cruz & Metavid

2009 Open Video Conference

Session held at at 11:08 am on 20-June-2009
NYU Vanderbilt Hall, New York, NY


A listing of other recorded sessions is available:

"Open Video Conference"

Session recorded by a conference attendee. The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Open Video Alliance or other participants.

This video is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 U.S. License, which may be found at the following URL:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us


Miro supports Ogg Theora and also provides copies to others; however, note that your IP address is no longer private information. Subscribe with Miro.

Donations to support this work may be directed to the videographer, Xiph.org Foundation, Participatory Culture Foundation, Creative Commons, the Internet Archive, and/or Sunlight Foundation.



All videos and text are published under the CC-BY 3.0 U. S. or CC-BY-SA 3.0. copyright licenses.  Details.